Premium from Freemium
Free public goods with close to zero marginal cost could profit from partial excludability.
When you visit your dentist, you often get a free sample of name-brand toothpaste. They are very handy for short business trips when light baggage is desirable. But if you decide to switch toothpaste brands, you must pay full price for your regular supply.
Thus free samples are a means to promote physical goods. Companies give away a little hoping to reap big gains from selling most of its products. After all, physical samples cost real money to produce and distribute.
With the advent of digital goods, the marginal cost for additional “samples” is close to zero. Most of them can be given away if enough payers are willing to pay for the fixed costs of providing them. In effect, zero marginal cost makes it both cheap to give digital goods away (freemium) and profitable to give most of them away. They are cheap because there is little consumption rivalry (one person’s consumption does not reduce other persons’ consumption). They are profitable because more exposure generates more revenues from the paying customers. These paying customers could be advertisers who are interested in reaching more potential customers of their non-digital products (e.g., search engines) or vendors of customized versions of the free versions (premium vs lite). In other words, the freemium version serves as a come-on to the premium version.
Thus, while physical goods with consumption rivalry and excludability must be provided as private goods at positive prices, digital goods with zero marginal cost could best be provided as free public goods with just enough partial excludability to ensure profitability. Partial excludability to otherwise public goods shows how digital market can creatively solve the historically incompatible goals of maximizing consumer surplus vs maximizing profit. Free access to resources with surplus capacity would maximize consumer surplus, and partial excludability would ensure enough profit to sustain the resources.
The consumer challenge is the embarrassment of free-good riches under time constraints. Retirees no longer need to waste their time playing bingo or playing golf any more. They can even go back to MOOC-school for free. In such a crowded space, one wonders how many of these digital startups that provide free public goods will become profitable. Many of them are funded by venture capital hoping for a big payout which may never come.
References:
- WSJ. 1/31/2009. “The economics of giving it away.”
Glossary:
- consumption rivalryThe inability of a good to serve simultaneously more than one user without quality degradation. For example, there is consumption rivalry for an apple between more than one user. But there is no consumption rivalry for public radio signals among listeners. See also "private goods," "public goods," "low-congestion goods," and "commons goods."
- consumer surplusConsumer surplus is the gap between what buyers are willing to pay and what they actually pay. Consumer surplus is highest when sellers' economic profit is zero and is zero when sellers can practice perfect price discrimination (i.e., selling each unit at buyer's reservation price). See also "economic surplus."
- marginal costAddition to total cost arising from producing one more unit or taking one more step. In the short run with fixed cost, these additions consist of entirely variable costs. When total variable cost increases at an increasing rate, marginal cost will increase. Under diminishing returns, marginal cost will be higher than average cost if average cost is rising and marginal cost will be lower than average cost if average cost is falling.
- private goodsGoods that are subject to consumption rivalry but can easily exclude non-payers.
- excludabilityThe ability to exclude non-paying users.
- public goodsGoods that are not subject to consumption rivalry but cannot easily exclude non-payers either by design or due to technical difficulty.
Topics:
Keywords
consumption rivalry, digital goods, excludability, freemium, premium, private goods, public goods